Is Eric Holder Playing Word Games?

Democrats are notorious for the tactical games of word definitions and/or misspeaking…

When looking through the recent and following documents from Eric Holder to Senator Rand Paul, one can see a clear setup, fix, or definition to follow.

To Senator Paul Letter Dated 3/4/13 from AG Holder

To Senator Paul Letter Dated 3/7/13 from AG Holder

Let’s just take Holder’s short note of March 7th…

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.

and leave blank, one word, each time as the following questions will not have been answered in Holder’s ‘caveat’ response. Any other person, place, or condition inserted will not carry the same weight of response from Mr. Holder to Senator Paul. A different question will get a different response.

Does the _______ have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to ____ a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use ______ weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a ______ drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized ____ to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to ______ an American not engaged in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American ______ engaged in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not _____ in combat on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in ____ on American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat ____ American soil?

Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American _____?

And if you don’t think 1 word makes a difference then you missed “Define the word IS” ala Clinton. I can see a future ‘Define the word THAT’ ala Holder from the little sentence “…The answer to that question is no”

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under Military, Radical by design, Security, Usurper

One response to “Is Eric Holder Playing Word Games?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s